Concurrent Audit of Treasury: IIBF Treasury Management Guide
A dealing room can lose more money in an afternoon than a branch network earns in a quarter, which is why the concurrent audit of treasury is a daily discipline rather than an annual event. Concurrent means the checking happens alongside the transaction, not months later when the trail has gone cold. For IIBF Treasury Management candidates this is a reliable scoring area, because the questions test control logic rather than arithmetic.
🔍 What the Concurrent Audit of Treasury Actually Covers
Concurrent audit is a continuous appraisal of transactions carried out at or near the time they are executed. RBI's revised guidelines on the Concurrent Audit System in Commercial Banks place treasury and dealing operations squarely within its mandatory scope, alongside large branches and forex-authorised offices, because these are the units where a single unchecked entry can create an outsized exposure.
The auditor is not a second dealer. The role is to verify that every transaction complies with the bank's own investment policy, the board-approved limit structure and the applicable RBI and FEDAI rules. Where a breach is found, the auditor records it, quantifies it and escalates it — the auditor never approves it after the fact.
Typical coverage of the concurrent audit of treasury includes:
- Deal capture: sequential numbering, time stamping and completeness of deal slips.
- Rate reasonableness: whether the rate dealt sits inside the day's traded band, and whether off-market or past-rate deals carried prior approval.
- Limit monitoring: counterparty, dealer, stop-loss, aggregate gap and open position limits.
- Settlement: confirmations matched, funds and securities delivered, failed trades investigated.
- Accounting: correct classification of the instrument, income booked in the right period, valuation applied per policy.
The organisational backdrop matters here, so read this alongside the chapter on integrated treasury, which explains why merging domestic and forex desks widened the perimeter an auditor has to cover in a single shift.
💡 Exam Tip: Remember the distinction examiners love. Concurrent audit checks compliance with limits; it does not set limits. Limits come from the board and the ALCO. Any option suggesting the auditor fixes or relaxes an exposure ceiling is wrong.
📋 The Deal Life Cycle an Auditor Walks Through
Every question on the concurrent audit of treasury reduces to one idea: follow the deal from the dealer's mouth to the general ledger and test each handover.
Front office
The dealer writes or captures a deal slip immediately. It must be sequentially numbered and time stamped, and cancelled slips must be accounted for rather than discarded. Dealing room telephone lines are voice recorded, and the recordings are retained and periodically sampled. Dealers are not permitted to strike deals from personal mobile phones or from outside the designated dealing room. The behavioural expectations behind these rules are set out in the chapter on ethics, morals and code of conduct for the dealing room.
Middle office
The middle office independently marks positions, measures limit utilisation and produces exception reports. The auditor tests whether exceptions were reported the same day and what happened next. A breach that was silently absorbed is a far more serious finding than a breach that was reported and cured.
Back office
The back office confirms the deal with the counterparty, matches incoming confirmations, releases settlement and reconciles the mirror accounts. Confirmation discipline is where most control failures surface, and the auditor checks unmatched confirmations by age. Where a bank has automated this chain, verification shifts from paperwork to system controls, which is the practical value of straight through processing in treasury — fewer manual touch points, fewer places for a rate to be altered after execution.
📊 Concurrent Audit Compared With the Other Assurance Layers
Candidates routinely confuse the four assurance layers that look at a treasury. They differ in who performs them, how often, and what question they are trying to answer.
| Assurance layer | Typically performed by | Frequency | Core question | Continuous cover of dealing operations? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concurrent audit | Bank officials or an external firm engaged for the purpose | Ongoing, alongside the transaction | Was this deal done within policy and limits? | ✅ Yes, that is its defining feature |
| Internal / risk based internal audit | The bank's internal audit function | Periodic, risk ranked | Is the control framework itself sound? | ❌ Sample based, not transaction by transaction |
| Statutory audit | Statutory central and branch auditors | Annual, with quarterly reviews | Do the financial statements show a true and fair view? | ❌ Year-end focus |
| RBI supervisory inspection | The Reserve Bank of India | Periodic supervisory cycle | Is the bank safe, sound and compliant? | ❌ Supervisory, not operational |
Findings flow upward through a defined route. Routine items go to the treasury head for rectification; serious irregularities are reported immediately and placed before the Audit Committee of the Board. Original circulars and inspection expectations are published by the Reserve Bank of India, and reading the source text once is worth more than three summaries.
🚩 Red Flags the Auditor Is Trained to Chase
Certain patterns come up in every treasury audit syllabus, and they make excellent multiple-choice material.
Broker concentration. Aggregate business routed through any single broker should not exceed 5% of the bank's total transactions for the year, excluding inter-bank deals. Crossing that threshold is not automatically fraudulent, but it must be reported to the Audit Committee of the Board with an explanation.
Reporting line contamination. The back office and middle office must not report to the head of the front office. If the person who books the deal also controls the person who confirms it, the control is cosmetic.
Stale reconciliations. Long-outstanding entries in mirror and correspondent accounts can conceal both errors and misappropriation, which is why ageing analysis is a standing audit item.
Position drift. Overnight exposure creeping beyond the sanctioned band is the classic finding, and it links directly to the net open position limit that every authorised dealer must observe.
Product-specific slips. Deposit-linked forex products carry documentation and cover requirements of their own, examined in the article on FCNR(B) deposits and forward cover. Similar tenor and disclosure discipline shows up outside banking too, for instance in the deposit acceptance norms for NBFCs.
⚠️ Common Mistake: Treating concurrent audit as a substitute for internal audit. It is an additional layer, not a replacement. A bank that runs concurrent audit still needs risk based internal audit, statutory audit and supervisory inspection.
For the market context behind these instruments and counterparties, the chapter on the financial market is the right companion reading.
🧠 Practice MCQs: Concurrent Audit of Treasury
Q1. As a control benchmark, aggregate business routed through a single broker in a year, excluding inter-bank deals, should not ordinarily exceed: (a) 2% of total transactions (b) 5% of total transactions (c) 10% of total transactions (d) 15% of total transactions
Answer: (b) — The 5% ceiling is the standard concentration benchmark, and any excess must be reported with justification to the Audit Committee of the Board.
Q2. Which of the following is NOT a function of the concurrent auditor of a treasury? (a) Verifying that deal slips are sequentially numbered (b) Checking utilisation against counterparty limits (c) Sanctioning an enhanced open position limit for a dealer (d) Reporting unmatched confirmations by age
Answer: (c) — Setting or enhancing limits is a board and ALCO function; the auditor tests compliance with limits and can never authorise a breach.
Q3. A serious irregularity detected during concurrent audit of a dealing room should be placed before the: (a) Branch manager of the nearest branch (b) Statutory central auditor at year end (c) Audit Committee of the Board (d) Front office head for internal closure
Answer: (c) — Serious irregularities are escalated promptly to the Audit Committee of the Board rather than settled within the business line.
Q4. Which reporting arrangement would an auditor immediately record as a control weakness? (a) Middle office reporting to the head of risk (b) Back office reporting to the head of the front office (c) Dealing room lines being voice recorded (d) Deal slips being time stamped on capture
Answer: (b) — Independence of the back office is fundamental; if it reports to the dealer's own boss, confirmation and settlement checks lose their value.
Q5. The defining characteristic that distinguishes concurrent audit from internal audit is that concurrent audit is: (a) Conducted only by external chartered accountants (b) Carried out at or near the time of the transaction (c) Limited strictly to the foreign exchange desk (d) Performed only after the financial year closes
Answer: (b) — Concurrency of timing is the distinguishing feature; it may be conducted by bank officials or an external firm, and it is not confined to one desk.
Want chapter-wise mock tests with 100+ MCQs? Start practising free →
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Who can be appointed as a concurrent auditor of a treasury?
Either the bank's own officials who are independent of the function being audited, or an external firm engaged for the purpose. The essential condition is independence from the dealing desk, not the auditor's employment status.
How often are concurrent audit findings reported?
Routine observations are reported on a defined periodic cycle, usually monthly, and are tracked to closure. Serious irregularities are not held back for the cycle; they go up immediately to senior management and the Audit Committee of the Board.
Does automation reduce the need for concurrent audit?
It changes the work rather than removing it. With straight through processing the auditor spends less time on slip matching and more on system access rights, maker-checker configuration, rate feed integrity and exception overrides.
Is the concurrent audit of treasury examinable in other IIBF papers?
Yes. The same control logic appears in risk management and compliance papers, so time invested here pays off across more than one subject, particularly in questions on segregation of duties and limit governance.
Treat the concurrent audit of treasury as a map of the dealing room rather than a list to memorise, and the questions answer themselves: who books, who confirms, who reconciles, and who is told when something breaks. Revise the related topics in our treasury management article hub, then apply the same control lens to the balance sheet through the CAIIB Bank Financial Management course and test yourself under timed conditions.
Practice this topic
Take a free mock test, download chapter PDFs, or watch a video class — all included on iibf.store.
