Section 138 NI Act cheque dishonour: CAIIB BRBL Complete Guide

Section 138 NI Act cheque dishonour is the most heavily tested legal provision in the CAIIB Banking Regulations and Business Laws paper, and examiners rarely ask what the section says — they ask you to count days. A cheque bounces, a notice is issued, a window closes, a complaint is filed. Every one of those steps has a statutory clock attached, and a candidate who mixes up 30 days with 15 days will lose the mark even if the concept is understood. This guide walks through the ingredients of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the surrounding sections that decide presumption, liability and jurisdiction, and the operational duty that sits on the branch when a cheque is returned unpaid.

Treat this as a working note rather than a summary. The numbers here — 30, 15, one month, 20 per cent, two years — are exactly the ones that appear in objective and case-study questions.

⚖️ The Five Ingredients of the Offence

Section 138 does not punish every bounced cheque. It punishes a specific fact pattern, and if any one element is missing the prosecution fails at the threshold. Committing these five ingredients to memory is the fastest scoring move in this chapter.

• A cheque drawn on the drawer's own account with a banker — not a demand draft, not a pay order, not a bill of exchange.
• Discharge of a legally enforceable debt or other liability, in whole or in part. A cheque given as a gift, or towards a time-barred or unlawful claim, falls outside the section — which is why the general principles you study in essentials of contract, guarantee and bailment feed directly into a Section 138 defence.
• Presentation within validity — the statute says six months from the date it is drawn or within the period of its validity, whichever is earlier. Since RBI reduced the currency of cheques to three months, the practical limit is three months from the date on the instrument.
• Return unpaid for insufficiency of funds or because the amount exceeds the arrangement with the bank. Courts have read this widely: a stop-payment instruction and a closed account are both treated as falling within the mischief, because the drawer cannot benefit from his own act of frustrating payment.
• Failure to pay after a valid demand notice, which is where the clock in the next section begins.

The punishment is imprisonment up to two years, or fine which may extend to twice the amount of the cheque, or both. Note that the offence is non-cognizable, bailable and compoundable — three adjectives that get shuffled in MCQs. Note also that Section 138 creates a criminal remedy only; the payee's civil suit for recovery of the debt survives independently, and pursuing one does not bar the other.

💡 Exam Tip: "Legally enforceable debt or other liability" is the ingredient most often attacked in court. If the underlying claim is time-barred, the cheque cannot found a Section 138 prosecution even though every other condition is satisfied.

⏱️ The 30-Day Notice, the 15-Day Window and the One-Month Complaint

The three provisos to Section 138, read with Section 142(1)(b), create a fixed sequence. Get the sequence right and the arithmetic questions on Section 138 NI Act cheque dishonour become free marks.

Step by step

First, the cheque must be presented within validity. Second, on receiving information from the bank that the cheque has been returned unpaid, the payee or holder in due course must make a written demand for payment within 30 days. Third, the drawer gets 15 days from receipt of that notice to pay. Only on the expiry of those 15 days does the cause of action arise. Fourth, the complaint must be filed within one month of the date on which the cause of action arose.

Two traps follow from this. A complaint filed before the 15 days expire is premature and is not curable by waiting — it must be filed afresh. And a complaint filed after the one-month limitation is not automatically dead: the proviso to Section 142(1)(b) allows the court to take cognizance later if the complainant satisfies it that there was sufficient cause for the delay.

One more point that examiners like: a cheque can be presented more than once within its validity, and a fresh cause of action arises on each dishonour provided a fresh notice is issued. The payee does not forfeit the remedy merely because he did not act on an earlier bounce.

📜 Presumption, the No-Intent Defence and Company Liability

Three short sections decide how the trial actually runs, and they are the reason conviction rates under this chapter are high.

Section 139 — presumption in favour of the holder

Once execution of the cheque is admitted or proved, the court shall presume that the holder received it for the discharge of a debt or liability. The burden then shifts to the drawer. This is a rebuttable presumption, and the standard of rebuttal is preponderance of probabilities, not proof beyond reasonable doubt — the accused need only raise a probable defence, after which the complainant must prove the debt.

Section 140 — no defence of innocent belief

It is not a defence that the drawer had no reason to believe, when he issued the cheque, that it might be dishonoured. This closes the "I thought the funds would arrive" argument permanently and makes the offence effectively one of strict liability on the mental element.

Section 141 — offences by companies

Where the drawer is a company, every person who at the time of the offence was in charge of, and responsible to, the company for the conduct of its business is deemed guilty along with the company. The proviso saves a person who proves the offence was committed without his knowledge or that he exercised all due diligence. A director who was merely on the board, without an averment in the complaint that he was in charge of the business, cannot be roped in — a point that matters when your branch is deciding whom to name. The section also protects a nominee director of the Central or State Government or a financial corporation owned by them.

⚠️ Common Mistake: Candidates write that Section 139 raises a presumption of guilt. It does not. It presumes only that the cheque was issued for a debt or liability, and the presumption is rebuttable.

🏛️ Jurisdiction, Interim Compensation and the Appellate Deposit

Two amendment waves reshaped the procedure around Section 138 NI Act cheque dishonour. The 2015 amendment fixed jurisdiction; the 2018 amendment put money in the complainant's hands before the appeal is decided.

Section 142(2) — where the complaint is filed

If the cheque is delivered for collection through an account, the offence is triable by the court within whose local jurisdiction the branch of the bank where the payee or holder maintains the account is situated. If it is presented for payment otherwise than through an account, jurisdiction lies where the branch of the drawee bank at which the drawer maintains the account is situated. Section 142A consolidates all complaints against the same drawer arising from multiple cheques before one court. This ended the forum-shopping problem and, from a banker's angle, ties the case to the collecting branch — the same branch whose records will later be produced.

Section 143A — interim compensation

The trial court may direct the drawer to pay interim compensation not exceeding 20 per cent of the cheque amount — in a summary or summons trial where the drawer pleads not guilty, or on framing of charge in any other case. It is payable within 60 days of the order, extendable by up to 30 further days for sufficient cause, and is recoverable as if it were a fine. If the drawer is later acquitted, the complainant repays it with interest.

Section 148 — deposit in appeal

In an appeal against conviction, the appellate court may order the appellant to deposit a minimum of 20 per cent of the fine or compensation awarded, over and above anything already paid under Section 143A. The same 60-day plus 30-day payment discipline applies. Together, 143A and 148 mean an unsuccessful drawer can be out of pocket to the tune of 40 per cent of the cheque value before the appeal is even heard.

🏦 Summary Trial and Compounding Under Sections 143 and 147

Section 143 allows the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class or Metropolitan Magistrate to try these cases summarily, and — departing from the ordinary summary-trial ceiling — to pass a sentence of imprisonment up to one year along with a fine exceeding Rs 5,000. If the magistrate forms the view that a longer sentence may be warranted, the case is recalled and tried as a summons case. The court is to endeavour to conclude the trial within six months of filing. Section 145 permits the complainant's evidence on affidavit, which is what keeps the summary procedure workable.

Section 147 makes every offence under the Act compoundable, and the Supreme Court has laid down a graded cost scale to discourage last-minute settlements: compounding at the earliest hearings attracts no cost, while compounding at progressively later stages — before the magistrate, the sessions or High Court, and the Supreme Court — attracts a rising percentage of the cheque amount, payable to the Legal Services Authority.

Compounding matters commercially because the offence is non-cognizable and bailable: no police investigation begins on its own, the payee drives the case by complaint, and the drawer's practical exit is settlement rather than acquittal. A settlement recorded early therefore costs the drawer far less than one negotiated on the steps of the appellate court, where the Section 148 deposit is already locked in. For the branch, the takeaway is procedural — every document the complainant will rely on comes from the bank, so the file must be complete on day one.

🧾 What the Banker's Return Memo Must Record

Section 146 gives the bank's slip or memo, bearing the official mark denoting dishonour, the status of prima facie evidence of the fact of dishonour. That single sentence is why the return memo is a legal document and not a courtesy note. It must state the exact reason for return in the standard language, carry the date of return and the authorised signature, and match the entry in the bank's books. Certified copies of those books are admissible under the Bankers' Books Evidence Act, 1891, and the electronic-clearing chain behind a truncated cheque is governed by the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007. Repeat dishonour handling — including stopping cheque facilities on habitually defaulting accounts — is part of the conduct standards covered under regulation of banking business.

Keep the two remedies separate. Section 138 is the customer's criminal action against the drawer. If the grievance is against the bank — a wrongly returned cheque, a delayed return memo, a wrong reason code — the customer's escalation is the RBI's Reserve Bank–Integrated Ombudsman Scheme, 2026, effective 1 July 2026, with a 90-day complaint window, an award ceiling of Rs 30 lakh and a separate cap of Rs 3 lakh for consequential loss including mental agony.

📌 Remember: The return memo is evidence under Section 146. A vague or altered reason code can sink the payee's case and expose the bank to an ombudsman complaint at the same time.

For the wider dispute-resolution picture, see how arbitration and conciliation in banking disputes operate alongside the criminal route, and how security-backed recovery under the SARFAESI Act enforcement of security interest runs on a completely different track. Where a third party has stood behind the cheque, the rules on contract of indemnity and guarantee for bankers decide whether the guarantor can be pursued as well. More chapter notes for this paper sit on the Banking Regulations and Business Laws tag hub, and candidates preparing the rural paper alongside should also revise Priority Sector Lending targets.

🧠 Practice MCQs: Section 138 and Cheque Dishonour

Want chapter-wise mock tests with 100+ MCQs? Start practising free →

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Section 138 rewards precision, not paraphrase. Learn the five ingredients, the 30-15-one-month sequence, and the four supporting sections — 139, 141, 142(2) and 143A — and you can answer almost anything the examiner sets on this chapter. Work through the full BRBL syllabus with chapter tests and case studies on the CAIIB course page, then time yourself on a full-length paper at iibf.store mock tests.